这是一篇关于新加坡法律论文代写论文：知识产权保护的问题。文章描述分析新加坡法律，突出写了知识产权保护的问题。
来自世界顶尖大学的专业本地写手根据您的要求帮助您各种论文代写修改。保证100％原始和准时提交高质的英文论文代写。按您的要求，写手可以根据您的写作风格将进行论文的个性化，提供免费outline或draft。写完的时候每篇论文通过turnitin检查，写后可以随时找我们无限免费修改
从之前的任务,我们调查了麦当劳公司的案件和未来企业PTE LTD，我们还介绍了基本的知识产权法律以及它们之间是如何相互关联的。在这个任务中,我们将相关案例的前提下，分析新加坡法律，然后我们将给我们的客户提供推荐来使他们更好地了解应该遵守的规章制度。
案件的总结
麦当劳公司和未来企业PTE LTD，核心操作单位的食品帝国控股有限公司,在2003年到2007年期间，参与了两个法律案件。麦当劳在2003年失去了第一种情况下，在企业视觉上不同于麦当劳公司的未来企业使用的标志。此外,未来企业鹰设备，同时麦当劳公司有其金色的弓箭手。因此,配色方案、字体，在未来企业的标志和字体非常不同于一个麦当劳使用的公司。麦当劳公司再次起诉未来企业，在2005年修改标志的MacCoffee鹰下降装置。麦当劳公司赢得了法院对未来企业，更高机会的混乱发生在公众和两个产品名称与咖啡饮料之间。
上述两种情况下是相互关联,这两种情况下涉及到商标的知识产权法律行为(TMA)s15 TMA的高度强调。在这两种情况下,麦当劳公司和未来企业做出了各种不同的上诉案件,这表明两家公司有伟大的意图和愿望来保护自己的商标。在这两种情况间的联系下,表明麦当劳想独占自己的商标食品和饮料而言。
知识产权保护的问题——The Issue of Intellectual Property Protection
From the previous assignment,we have look into the cases involving McDonald Corporation and Future Enterprise PTE LTD,we have also introduced the basic intellectual property laws and how they are inter-related to one another.In this assignment,we will analyze the Singapore Laws that is related to the cases involved,and then we will provide recommendation to give our client a better idea of the rules and regulations they should abide.
案件的总结——Summary of the cases
McDonald Corporation and Future Enterprise PTE LTD,core-operating unit of Food Empire Holding Limited,are involved in two law cases during the period of 2003 to 2007.McDonald lost the first case in 2003 as the mark used by Future Enterprise is visually different from McDonald Corporation.Furthermore,Future Enterprise has its eagle device while McDonald Corporation has its golden archer.Therefore,the color scheme,font,and typeface on the mark of the Future Enterprise is very different from the one used by McDonald Corporation.McDonald Corporation sued Future Enterprise again in 2005 for amending the logo of MacCoffee by dropping the eagle device.McDonald Corporation has won this court case against Future Enterprise as there is a higher chance of confusion that will occur in the public and both products names are relate to coffee beverages.
Both cases mentioned above are inter-related with each other as both cases involved the Intellectual Property Law of Trade Mark Act(TMA)where s15 of the TMA is highly emphasized.In the midst of both cases,both McDonald Corporation and Future Enterprise have made various appeals to the cases and this shows that both companies have the great intention and desires to protect their own trademarks.The connection between both cases shows that McDonald wanted to monopolize their trademark as far as food and beverages were concerned.Future Enterprise which also wanted to conserve its right of the prefix Mac in the same industry tried it's best to maintain its position.